Therefore, an "endorsement" mechanism was introduced, so anyone who submitted a few papers to archive can recommend a preprint of a new guy to be accepted. This is not a true peer-review, the endorser is only expected to check whether the preprint is about science in general, like it doesn't pretend to prove how stupid Einstein was. Not all the archive sections require endorsement - I guess, only fundamental topics, like high-energy physics do.
I'm an endorser for the atomic physics and chemical physics sections, which is quite useless, since no endorsement is needed there. However, today I've got the first "can you endorse me, please?" kind of message, and, yes, this is one from a science freak. I don't know what to do, I must confess. :-)
3 comments:
I guess it is. But I was surprised that in our not really fundamental science there are some freaks as well.
Hi, can you please give me an information? I wanted to put one of my papers in ArXiv Classical Physics section. I have asked endorsement from an endorser in the relevant field. And he has agreed. But the problem is that I do not have the endorsement code. Can you please tell me where from one gets this six character endorsement code?
can u suggest me an endorser i m not able to find one
Ankit
Post a Comment